<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Anarchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/online-anarchy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/online-anarchy</link>
	<description>The Information Technology Law Blog and Podcast by Professor Michael Scott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:41:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Synchronicity - &#187; Ignore the DMCA?</title>
		<link>http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/online-anarchy/comment-page-1#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Synchronicity - &#187; Ignore the DMCA?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularitylaw.com/?p=35#comment-275</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott correctly points out that our society has a longstanding tradition of ignoring laws that it considers unfair: Civil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott correctly points out that our society has a longstanding tradition of ignoring laws that it considers unfair: Civil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/online-anarchy/comment-page-1#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularitylaw.com/?p=35#comment-274</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t yet formed an opinion on the merits of the AACS encryption issue mostly because I&#039;m having trouble thinking about a hex number sequence as a copyrightable expression.  If anything, it seems more like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_secret&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;trade secret&lt;/a&gt; to me.  Of course, by now the code wouldn&#039;t be a trade secret anymore since it is &quot;generally known to the relevant portion of the public.&quot;  And, in this case, it appears to have been discovered by reverse engineering, which could mean that it was not illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t yet formed an opinion on the merits of the AACS encryption issue mostly because I&#8217;m having trouble thinking about a hex number sequence as a copyrightable expression.  If anything, it seems more like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_secret" rel="nofollow">trade secret</a> to me.  Of course, by now the code wouldn&#8217;t be a trade secret anymore since it is &#8220;generally known to the relevant portion of the public.&#8221;  And, in this case, it appears to have been discovered by reverse engineering, which could mean that it was not illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
