<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prove Our Case?  . . . We Don’t Need to Prove Our Stinkin’ Case!! Just Fork Over the Money.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/internet-e-commerce-law/prove-our-case-we-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-prove-our-stinkin%e2%80%99-case-just-fork-over-the-money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/internet-e-commerce-law/prove-our-case-we-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-prove-our-stinkin%e2%80%99-case-just-fork-over-the-money</link>
	<description>The Information Technology Law Blog and Podcast by Professor Michael Scott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:41:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Absurd &#187; Prove Our Case? . . . We Don’t Need to Prove Our Stinkin’ Case!!&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://singularitylaw.com/technology-law/internet-e-commerce-law/prove-our-case-we-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-prove-our-stinkin%e2%80%99-case-just-fork-over-the-money/comment-page-1#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Absurd &#187; Prove Our Case? . . . We Don’t Need to Prove Our Stinkin’ Case!!&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singularitylaw.com/?p=66#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>[...] Prove Our Case? . . . We Don’t Need to Prove Our Stinkin’ Case!!&#8230; To allow such an absurd claim to prevail would be to overrule hundreds of years of jurisprudence. For, you see, copyright infringement is a&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prove Our Case? . . . We Don’t Need to Prove Our Stinkin’ Case!!&#8230; To allow such an absurd claim to prevail would be to overrule hundreds of years of jurisprudence. For, you see, copyright infringement is a&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
