Several years ago, the school began looking into how the Internet could be used to provide a totally online LL.M program. After an enormous amount of planning, our online LL.M program in entertainment and media law will be launched this fall. Internet law courses will be an integral part of that program. Information on the program is available here.

Restructuring traditional courses to work online has been – and continues to be – a challenging, but surprisingly satisfying, experience. It has allowed me to rethink each of the courses I have been teaching face-to-face, and to reimagine how the subject matter can be taught online. I have found it necessary to totally redo my syllabus, the way in which I organize my lectures, and what reading materials are best suited for a distance-learning environment. This effort has made me realize how some of these innovations can be integrated back into my traditional courses, which I believe will make the classroom experience significantly more engaging, and in the end more effective.

For many traditional law courses, which change little from year-to-year, once the syllabus is created and the lectures are “in the can,” most of the hard work of an online course is done. But in the area of Internet law, the subject matter is changing virtually every day. One of the major challenges has been to organize the materials and to structure the lectures and assignments in such a way that it won’t be necessary to redo the course entirely every time it is given (which will be three times a year). Instead of long-form lectures, the course has been designed with a series of shorter, topic-specific lectures. Some of the lectures will be usable from term-to-term with little or no updating. Other lectures will need to be re-recorded virtually every term to incorporate the newest developments in case law, statutory provisions and technological developments.

Of course, whether my course design will work online (or not) will be largely theoretical until I have been through the course at least once. Only when I look back at how well the structure worked the first time, and envision how well it will work the second and third time out, will I know if my redesign worked – or whether another redo will be in order. I’ll let you know in six months or so.

This summer will be the inaugural program in International Information Technology Law sponsored by Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles, The program will be held at the University College of London Law Faculty building (Bentham House) in the heart of the UCL campus and just off of Russell Square — in the heart of London.

We have an outstanding faculty:

* Prof. Susan Brenner, University of Dayton (International Cybercrimes)
* Prof. Ian Walden, Queen Mary School of Law, London (Comparative Information Privacy Law and Regulations)
* Prof. Michael Scott, Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles (Drafting Information Technology Agreements), and
* Dr. Julia Hörnle, Queen Mary School of Law, London (Comparative Electronic Commerce Law and Regulation).

The program will run from June 21-July 24, 2009. Students will stay in College Hall, a recently opened housing facility, which is only a short walk from the classrooms. Classes go from 9-1:10 from Monday-Thursday, giving students every afternoon to explore all that London has to offer, plus every weekend is a three-day weekend for those who would like to travel outside of London.

Due to space limitations, we can only accept 48 students. So if you are interested, or know someone who might be, please let them know.

This is a QuickTime video, so to view it in a larger window simply click “download” below instead of playing it in your browser. It will also be available in our iTunes podcast feed.

We’re also ramping up a new episode of our podcast for today. Episode 7: “The Global Perspective” will be available tonight, so stay tuned!

1. Tell me about the new Information Technology (IT) Law Summer Program in London?

The program will allow students to earn six units of course credit while enjoying five incredible weeks in London. Each student will choose two of four courses: Comparative Electronic Commerce Law, Comparative Information Privacy Law, International Cybercrimes or Drafting Information Technology Agreements. Classes will be held from 9-1, Monday through Thursday, which makes every weekend a three-day weekend. Classes will be supplemented by field trips, guest speakers and various social events.

2. When did you develop the idea for the IT Summer Law Program?

I have been interested in expanding the school’s offerings in international technology law since I joined the full-time faculty in 2003. There are not a lot of professors in Los Angeles, or even the United States, that have expertise in this area. Because of the growing importance of the European Union, and the enactment of new IT laws in the EU, it made sense to locate the program within the EU where we can hire professors knowledgeable in comparative US-EU IT laws.

3. Is this the first program of its kind?

Yes. There have been summer abroad programs that offer one or two courses in IT law, but this is the only program that focuses exclusively on international IT law. This gives students interested in practicing in this field a great opportunity to learn from professors who are internationally recognized educators in the field. It should give students participating in the program a distinct advantage over other students in getting a job in the IT sector.

4. Why London?

I actually looked at several other cities in Europe first. I had a list of characteristics I was looking for in a host city. None of the other cities had all of those characteristics; London did. In London you have first class housing and classroom facilities, a great transportation system, plenty of cultural, social and educational opportunities, easy access to other European destinations, a safe environment, and the ability to attract a world-class faculty.

London is, in my opinion, the most exciting city in the world. Spending five weeks in London is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. There is a dizzying array of things to do in London, from watching tennis stars at Wimbledon to enjoying plays, musicals and outdoor concerts just down the street from the school. We are literally only blocks away from the British Museum, the British Library and numerous historical sites. Stonehenge, Oxford, the Edinburgh Festival (and many other destinations) are easily accessible by train or bus. In addition, most European cities are no more than an hour or two away. For example, there is a train within walking distance of the dorm that will whisk you to downtown Paris in just two hours. You can have lunch overlooking the Eiffel Tower and be back in London in time for dinner, or spend the entire weekend in Paris or another wonderful destination.

5. What makes this such an exciting and timely program?

The Internet and electronic commerce are the fastest growing business sectors worldwide. Every company, whether considered “high tech” or otherwise, understands the importance of being “online.” As a result, there is an enormous demand for tech-savvy attorneys, even when there is a downturn in the economy. These classes are unique and will provide students with an international perspective on IT law that is simply not available elsewhere.

6. How and why was each participating faculty member selected for the program?

Having practiced in the international IT law field for almost 30 years, I have had the opportunity to travel extensively and get to know IT lawyers and academics worldwide. When I was planning this program I contacted dozens of recognized experts in the field and asked them whom they thought were the best educators in IT law in the U.S. and the UK. That search led me to each of the professors who will be teaching in the program. As shown by their biographies, they are all accomplished authors, speakers and teachers. It is a truly an amazing faculty.

7. What are some of the biggest issues in IT law and how will this program help prepare students interested in the field?

When a company establishes a website, it is instantly doing business globally. That means that the company is potentially subject to the laws of every country in which its website is accessible, including contract law, privacy law, and criminal law. It is not sufficient for a company’s lawyers to understand only the laws of the country in which that company is located. They must understand the potential impact of foreign laws on their client’s business, and the potential liability that client may face around the world. This program will provide students with that global perspective.

The four courses being offered and the instructors are:

Comparative Electronic Commerce Law and Regulations
Instructor: Dr. Julia Hornle, Queen Mary College of Law, University of London

Comparative Information Privacy Law and Regulations
Professor Ian Walden, Queen Mary College of Law, University of London

Drafting Information Technology Agreements
Professor Michael D. Scott, Southwestern Law School (me)

International Cybercrimes
Professor Susan Brenner, University of Dayton School of Law

The program will run June 21, 2009-July 24, 2009 and is open to any law student from an ABA-accredited law school in the United States, Canadian law students and other law students who can demonstrate English language proficiency. The brochure is available here.

If you are a law student, a law professor, or someone who knows a law student who might be interested in the program, please let them know about it. Due to limited classroom space, the program is limited to 48 students. Students will be admitted to the program on a rolling basis starting in January 2009, so early application is essential. The application is available here.

Law students need to know a lot about a lot of different areas, not just of law, but history, business, literature, culture, languages, etc. This breadth of learning should start in college, continue through law school, and into practice.

There is a wonderful quote from Vladimir Nabokov, Russian author of Lolita (and many other works):

The more things we know the better equipped we are to understand any one thing and it is a burning pity that our lives are not long enough and not sufficiently free of annoying obstacles, to study all things with the same care and depth as the one we now devote to some favorite subject or period. And yet there is a semblance of consolation within this dismal state of affairs: in the same way as the whole universe may be completely reciprocated in the structure of an atom, . . . an intelligent and assiduous student [may] find a small replica of all knowledge in a subject he has chosen for his special research. . . . and if, upon choosing your subject, you try diligently to find out about it, if you allow yourself to be lured into the shaded lanes that lead from the main road you have chosen to the lovely and little known nooks of special knowledge, if you lovingly finger the links of the many chains that connect your subject to the past and the future and if by luck you hit upon some scrap of knowledge referring to your subject that has not yet become common knowledge, then will you know the true felicity of the great adventure of learning….

(Quoted in Vladimir Nabokov: The American Years, by Brian Boyd.)

My son is getting ready to go to college in the fall. He wants to be a lawyer, and is already trying to find classes (as a freshman) that will “better equip” him for law school. I am telling him that he needs to take a broad, liberal arts education, which will give him the breadth and depth of understanding of human culture, interaction, philosophy, society, history, etc. This will give him the grounding he needs to understand how law works in context. But I can see it is going to be a battle.

I was an earlier adopter of cell phones, getting my first one in 1985 when I had a small law firm and needed to be in regular communication with my office. However, I quickly found that it was as much of a nuisance as an assistance to my practice and in the early 1990s I got rid of it. I didn’t like the idea of being “always on” — always accessible by employees, other attorneys, and worst yet, my clients. I often needed time to decompress and couldn’t do so if I was expected to always be accessible by phone. I needed time to think uninterrupted. I found that when I ridded myself of the cell phone I was able to provide just as good service to my clients, just as good supervision to my employees and at the same time could allocate my time the way that I wanted to do so, not how others wanted to allocate my time for me. I didn’t lose any clients nor were there any “emergencies” that couldn’t wait for me to get back to the office.

I didn’t get another cell phone until 2005 when my youngest son wanted one and we could get 2 for the price of one. I now find that people are more courteous about calling me and I don’t have this constant barrage of calls every time some little crisis arises. I probably use my cell phone significantly less than others, and yet find it a useful and “appropriate” technology for my lifestyle today.

The same is true of my computers. I have a good, relatively fast Apple computer on which I am running an older version of Microsoft Office. While many of my students have newer, faster machines, and the most current version of Office, I really see no reason to update my technology. It does what I need at an acceptable speed. I don’t consider myself a Luddite, just someone that believes that new technologies should serve me, not the other way around.

Why am I writing about this at all? Because there is currently a raging debate going on at our law school as well as law schools nationwide (and perhaps worldwide) about Internet access in the classrooms. Students have always found ways to entertain themselves in class (other than actually listening to the professor and learning the subject matter). In the early days it was passing notes and whispering to one another. Others doodled or did crossword puzzles. However, with the advent of personal computers and wireless Internet access, the diversions have expanded to include email, watching YouTube videos, shopping online, etc. No matter the ranking of the law school or the quality of the teaching, students more and more are being diverted by the cornucopia of options available online, and are less engaged than ever.

A recent article from the University of Chicago Law School has created quite a stir on campuses nationwide. The administration recently announced that it was cutting off Internet access in the classrooms due to the fact that students are distracted by the Internet and are not participating in classes. Chicago, one of the best law schools in the country, has decided that allowing students access to the Internet in the classrooms is an unacceptable distraction. The article indicates that administrators were amazed at how pervasive surfing was during classes, and how students were not listening, professors would have to repeat questions a second time because students did not hear them the first time, and how the Internet was destroying the classroom experience for too many students.

When several professors suggested that our law school do the same last fall, I was cool to the idea. I saw the value of allowing students the freedom to use the Internet to supplement what I was talking about in the classroom, and generally felt that our students were old enough to understand the importance of being active participants in class. However, this year I have seen the classroom dialogue disappear. It is now a soliliquy — I talk, they surf. I have come to the conclusion, as more and more professors and administrators have, that the siren call of the Internet is too strong for all but the most dedicated students. The MTV generation, with its need to multitask, finds that it does not have the discipline to focus attention on one thing at a time. And the only way to try to get students to reengage in the dialogue that is such a critical part of the legal learning process is to remove the temptation of the Internet from the classroom.

I believe that laptop computers are an appropriate technology in the classroom (although they can also be abused by being used to play games or turn students into stenographers), but the Internet is not. Whether, and if so when, my law school will join the growing ranks of educational institutions nationwide that are blocking Internet access from the classroom I do not know. But in my opinion, the sooner the better.

The program will offer four courses, from which students can choose two. The courses are International and Comparative E-Commerce Law, International and Comparative Information Privacy Law, Current Developments in International Internet Law, and a skills-based class on Drafting Technology Agreements. We will have two U.S.- and two U.K-based professors, and will supplement the classroom presentations with field trips and guest lectures.

This is the first summer program for law students that focuses exclusively on international IT law. We would be very interested in hearing from lawyers in the U.K. who would be interested in being guest speakers or assisting in field trips near the London campus. There will be 50 highly motivated law students, many of whom will be practicing in the IT Law field in a few years.

Based on other summer abroad programs, participants will have an incredible time, learn a lot and make friends that they will keep throughout their legal careers.

Below is the list I came up with. I’d appreciate any corrections or additions to the list that you might know of.

1. Albany Law School (Internet Law)
2. American Univ. Wash College of Law (Law in the Information Society; E-Commerce Law and Drafting)
3. Appalachian School of Law (Cyberlaw)
4. Arizona State Univ. School of Law (Intellectual Property in Cyberspace; Introduction to E-Commerce; E-Commerce Seminar)
5. Barry Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
6. Boston College School of Law (IP in the Digital Era)
7. Boston Univ. School of Law (Cyberlaw; E-Commerce for the Business Lawyer; Internet Law; Software and the Law)
8. Brooklyn Law School (Law and Technology; Computers and the Law Seminar; Internet Law)
9. BYU School of Law (E-Commerce and Internet Law)
10. California Western School of Law (Cyberspace Law)
11. Campbell Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
12. Capital Univ. Law School (Computer Law)
13. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva Univ. (Cyberlaw; Cyberlaw, Advanced Topics)
14. Case Western Reserve Law School (Advance Contracts: E-Commerce; Computer Law & Policy; Contemporary Issues in Law & Technology; Cyberlaw; ePayment Systems; IT Principles for Lawyers; Legal Counsel to the Technology Entrepreneur)
15. Catholic Univ. of America, Columbus School of Law (Cyberlaw I: Legal Issues Relating to Computer Networks; Cyber Law II: Legal Issues Related to Doing Business in a Digital World; Computer Law; New Communications Technology & the Law)
16. Chapman Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
17. Charleston Law School (Technology and the Law)
18. Chicago-Kent School of Law (E-Commerce Law)
19. Cleveland-Marshall School of Law (Cyber Law)
20. College of William & Mary School of Law (Internet Law)
21. Columbia Univ. School of Law (Information Technology Law; Life, Liberty and Liability in the Digital Millennium; Electronic Commerce)
22. Cornell Univ. School of Law (Contract Law in the Electronic Age; eLaw)
23. Creighton Univ. School of Law (Computer Technology and the Law; Legal Issues in Electronic Commerce)
24. DePaul Univ. School of Law (Computer Law; Cyberlaw; Electronic Commerce)
25. Dickinson School of Law (Internet Law)
26. Drake Law School (Computers and the Law)
27. Duke Univ. School of Law (Advanced Copyright: Digital Technologies; Constitution in Cyberspace; Property Rights Versus the Commons in High Technology)
28. Duquesne Univ. School of Law (Computer Law)
29. Emory Univ. Law School (Computer Law)
30. Florida A&M Univ. College of Law (Internet and Computer Law)
31. Florida State Univ. School of Law (Cyber Law)
32. Fordham Univ. School of Law (E-Commerce; Old Media, New Media, Internet and the First Amendment)
33. Franklin Pierce (e-Commerce & the Law; Internet Regulation)
34. George Mason Univ. School of Law (Internet and Online Law)
35. George Washington Univ. Law School (Computer Law; Law in Cyberspace)
36. Georgetown Univ. School of Law (Law of Cyberspace; Law, Policy and Politics in the Internet Age; Information Technology Transactions: Strategy, Negotiations and Drafting; Intellectual Property and Computer Software Seminar)
37. Georgia State College of Law (Computer Law; Computers and Law Seminar; Law of Electronic Commerce)
38. Golden Gate Univ. School of Law (Cyberlaw & Privacy; E-Commerce Law; Internet and Software Law)
39. Harvard Law School (Cyberlaw: Internet Points of Control; Internet Law and Politics: Seminar; Practical Lawyering and Internet-Related Issues: Seminar)
40. Hofstra Univ. School of Law (Law in Cyberspace)
41. Howard Univ. School of Law (Computer Law)
42. Indiana Univ. School of Law – Bloomington (E-Commerce Law; Internet Law)
43. Indiana Univ. School of Law – Indianapolis (Internet Law)
44. John Marshall Law School (Domestic and Transnational Notarial and Digital Signature Law; Introduction to Information Technology Law; Protection of Intellectual Property in a Global/Digital Environment; Information Law & Policy; Contemporary Problems in Computer Law; Contemporary Problems in Technology and Intellectual Property Law; Computers and the Law; Cyberspace Law; Current Topics in Information Technology Law; Electronic Commerce Law; Free Speech in Cyberspace; Governance and Regulation in Cyberspace; Jurisdiction and Judgments in Cyberspace)
45. Lewis & Clark Law School (Cyberspace Law)
46. LSU Law School (Internet Law)
47. Loyola Law School (LA) (Internet Law and Technology; Information Technology Transactions Seminar; Intellectual Property in the Digital Age)
48. Loyola Univ. (Chicago) School of Law (Cyberlaw: Introduction to Legal Issues Arising on the Internet; The Law of Electronic Commerce)
49. Loyola Univ. (New Orleans) School of Law (Computer Law)
50. Macon State College (Legal Issues in Technology)
51. Marquette Univ. School of Law (Cyberlaw; Computer Law)
52. Michigan State Univ. College of Law (Intellectual Property in the Internet Age; E-Commerce; Cyberlaw)
53. New England School of Law (Computer Law; Internet Law and Practice)
54. New York Law School (Copyright, Innovation, and the Internet; Cyberlaw; Information Law; Advanced Issues in IP: Videogame Law)
55. Northeastern Univ. School of Law (Software and Internet Law)
56. Northern Illinois Univ. College of Law (E-Commerce Law)
57. Northwestern Univ. School of Law (Computers and the Law; Internet Fraud; Music, Copyright and Digital Technology; Telecommunications and Internet Policy)
58. Nova Univ. School of Law (Computers and the Law)
59. NYU School of Law (Internet Commerce; Internet Contracts; Technological Impact on Contracts in the Digital World; Topics in E-Commerce)
60. Ohio State Univ. Moritz School of Law (Intellectual Property and Internet Law)
61. Oklahoma City School of Law (Computer Law; Electronic Commerce and Banking)
62. Pace Univ. School of Law (Computer Law)
63. Pepperdine Univ. School of Law (Law of Cyberspace)
64. Quinnipiac Univ. School of Law (Computer and Internet Law)
65. Rutgers Univ. School of Law (Camden) (Cyberlaw)
66. Rutgers Univ. School of Law (Newark) (Electronic Commerce; Internet and Intellectual Property Law; Internet Law)
67. Santa Clara Univ. School of Law (Computer Law Seminar; Cyberspace Law; Digital Law.com; Digital Property; E-Commerce; New Media Law; Future of Commerce)
68. Seattle Univ. School of Law (Electronic Commerce; First Amendment Doctrines and the Internet)
69. Seton Hall Law School (Electronic Commerce; Internet Law)
70. South Texas College of Law (Computer Law)
71. Southern Ill. Univ. School of Law (Electronic Commerce)
72. Southern Methodist Univ. School of Law (Advanced Commercial Law: Law of Electronic Commerce)
73. Southern New England School of Law (Computer Law)
74. Southwestern Law School (Internet and E-Commerce Law; Drafting and Negotiating Technology Contracts; Information Privacy Law)
75. St. John’s Univ. School of Law (Computers and the Law; Internet Law)
76. St. Mary’s Univ. School of Law (Computer Law and the Internet)
77. Stanford Univ. School of Law (Internet Commerce: The Emerging Legal Framework)
78. Stetson Univ. School of Law (Cyberlaw Seminar)
79. Suffolk Univ. School of Law (e-Commerce and the Law; Internet Law; Software Law)
80. Syracuse Univ. College of Law (Internet Law)
81. Temple Univ. School of Law (Cyberlaw and Policy: Practical Applications in Organizational Settings; Cyberspace; Law of Electronic Commerce)
82. Texas Tech Univ. School of Law (Intellectual Property and High Technology)
83. Texas Wesleyan School of Law (Computer Law Seminar)
84. Thomas Jefferson School of Law (Advanced Internet Law; Internet and Technology Law; Commercial Transactions and E-Commerce; Computer and Internet Law; Cyber Law)
85. Thomas M. Cooley School of Law (Computer Law; Law of Cyberspace; Representing the E-Business Client)
86. Tulane Univ. Law School (Cyberlaw; Law & Emerging Technologies Seminar)
87. Tulsa Univ. College of Law (Internet Law)
88. Tuoro Law Center (Computer Law; Cyber Law)
89. Univ. of Akron School of Law (Computer Law; Cyberlaw)
90. Univ. of Alabama School of Law (Computers and the Law)
91. Univ. of Arkansas (Little Rock) School of Law (Computer Law Seminar)
92. Univ. of Baltimore School of Law (Cyberspace Law Seminar)
93. Univ. at Buffalo Law School (Technology Management & E-Business; Internet Music Licensing, Litigation and Liability; Legal and Cultural Issues in Cyberspace; Intellectual Property and the Internet)
94. UCLA Law School (Technology and the Law; Cyberlaw, Information Privacy Seminar)
95. Univ. of California (Berkeley) (Cyberlaw; Computer Law)
96. Univ. of California (Davis) (Law of E-Commerce; Intellectual Property in Cyberspace; Jurisdiction in Cyberspace; The Internet and the Law)
97. Univ. of California (Hastings) (Cyberspace Law Seminar; Comparative Cyberlaw Seminar)
98. Univ. of Chicago Law School (Electronic Commerce Law; Information Technology Law: Complex Industry Transactions; Information Technology Law: Renegotiating the Right Path to Outsourcing Success)
99. Univ. of Cincinnati School of Law (Computer Law)
100. Univ. of Connecticut School of Law (Legal and Cultural Issues of Cyberspace; Constitution/Evidence in Cyberspace; Legal/Cultural Issues Cyberspace)
101. Univ. of Dayton School of Law (Cyberspace Law; Electronic Commerce)
102. Univ. of Denver School of Law (Computers and Internet Law; Law & Technology (Information Technology & the Law); Technology and the Internet Seminar)
103. Univ. of Detroit Mercy School of Law (Computer Law; Computer Law: Protection of Intellectual Property Rights; Internet Law)
104. Univ. of Florida, Levin School of Law (E-Commerce Regulation; Internet Intellectual Property; Law of Cyberspace; Computers and the Law)
105. Univ. of Georgia School of Law (Law and the Information Age)
106. Univ. of Hawai’i School of Law (Internet Law & Policy)
107. Univ. of Houston School of Law (Copyright and New Technology Law; Information Law Seminar; Network Law; Computer Law; Special Topics in Internet Law
108. Univ. of Iowa School of Law (Cyberspace Law Seminar)
109. Univ. of Louisville Brandeis School of Law (Intellectual Property Issues in the Digital Age)
110. Univ. of Maine School of Law (Internet Law)
111. Univ. of Maryland School of Law (Cyberspace Law Seminar; E-Commerce Law)
112. Univ. of Memphis School of Law (Cyberlaw)
113. Univ. of Miami School of Law (Internet Law)
114. Univ. of Michigan School of Law (Cyberlaw and Econ Workshop; E-Commerce Law; The Law in Cyberspace
115. Univ. of Minnesota School of Law (Cyberspace & the Law Seminar; E-Commerce; Law and Computers)
116. Univ. of Missouri – Columbia School of Law (Cyberlaw and Cyberlawyering; Electronic Commerce Law; Software Law)
117. Univ. of Missouri – KC School of Law (Cyberlaw and the Infosphere)
118. Univ. of Montana (Technology and the Law)
119. Univ. of Nevada Las Vegas School of Law (Cyberlaw)
120. Univ. of New Mexico School of Law (Information Technology Law)
121. Univ. of North Carolina School of Law (Technology and Intellectual Property; Cyberspace Law)
122. Univ. of Notre Dame Law School (Cyberlaw)
123. Univ. of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law (Computer and Internet Law)
124. Univ. of Pennsylvania School of Law (Electronic Commerce)
125. Univ. of Richmond School of Law (Computer Law; Information Design and the Law)
126. Univ. of San Diego School of Law (The Constitution and the Internet; Cyberspace Law)
127. Univ. of San Francisco School of Law (Cyberspace Law; Cyberspace Law Seminar; Electronic Commerce Law; Information Technology Law)
128. Univ. of South Carolina School of Law (Cyberspace Law)
129. Univ. of Southern California School of Law (Internet Law)
130. Univ. of St. Thomas School of Law (Computer and Internet Law)
131. Univ. of Texas (Austin) (Intellectual Property in Cyberspace; Digital Copyright; E-Commerce Law; Cyberlaw: Strategies of Freedom & Control)
132. Univ. of Toledo School of Law (E-Commerce; Cyberspace Law)
133. Univ. of Utah College of Law (Cyberlaw and E-Commerce)
134. Univ. of Virginia School of Law (Free Expression in Cyberspace; Law and Technology Policy)
135. Univ. of Washington School of Law (Electronic Commerce and Information Technology; Legal Protection of Computer Software; EU, UK and US Regulation of E-Commerce and the Information Society)
136. Univ. of Wisconsin School of Law (Law, Technology & Society)
137. Vanderbilt Univ. School of Law (Law of Cyberspace; Regulation of the Internet Seminar)
138. Vermont Law School (Internet Law)
139. Villanova Univ. School of Law (e-Business; e-Law; Intellectual Property in Cyberspace; Law and the Internet)
140. Wake Forest Univ. School of Law (Computer Law; Internet Business Law)
141. Washburn Univ. School of Law (Computers and Cyberlaw Seminar)
142. Washington & Lee Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
143. Washington Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
143. Washington Univ. (St. Louis) School of Law (Cyberspace Law)
144. Wayne State Univ. School of Law (Digital Copyright & Digital Copyright Seminar; Law of Electronic Commerce)
145. West Virginia Univ. School of Law (Cyber Law)
146. Western States Univ. School of Law (Internet Law)
147. Whittier Law School (Internet Law; Computers and the Law Seminar)
148. Willamette Univ. College of Law (The Computer and the Law)
149. William Mitchell College of Law (Internet and E-Commerce Law)
150. Yale Law School (Access to Knowledge Practicum; Knowledge and Information Policy; [The] Information Society)